Failed to save the file to the "xx" directory.

Failed to save the file to the "ll" directory.

Failed to save the file to the "mm" directory.

Failed to save the file to the "wp" directory.

403WebShell
403Webshell
Server IP : 66.29.132.124  /  Your IP : 18.191.72.220
Web Server : LiteSpeed
System : Linux business141.web-hosting.com 4.18.0-553.lve.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 27 15:27:34 UTC 2024 x86_64
User : wavevlvu ( 1524)
PHP Version : 7.4.33
Disable Function : NONE
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : ON  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : ON  |  Sudo : OFF  |  Pkexec : OFF
Directory :  /opt/alt/ruby31/share/rubygems/rubygems/resolver/molinillo/lib/molinillo/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :


[ Back ]     

Current File : /opt/alt/ruby31/share/rubygems/rubygems/resolver/molinillo/lib/molinillo/resolution.rb
# frozen_string_literal: true

module Gem::Resolver::Molinillo
  class Resolver
    # A specific resolution from a given {Resolver}
    class Resolution
      # A conflict that the resolution process encountered
      # @attr [Object] requirement the requirement that immediately led to the conflict
      # @attr [{String,Nil=>[Object]}] requirements the requirements that caused the conflict
      # @attr [Object, nil] existing the existing spec that was in conflict with
      #   the {#possibility}
      # @attr [Object] possibility_set the set of specs that was unable to be
      #   activated due to a conflict.
      # @attr [Object] locked_requirement the relevant locking requirement.
      # @attr [Array<Array<Object>>] requirement_trees the different requirement
      #   trees that led to every requirement for the conflicting name.
      # @attr [{String=>Object}] activated_by_name the already-activated specs.
      # @attr [Object] underlying_error an error that has occurred during resolution, and
      #    will be raised at the end of it if no resolution is found.
      Conflict = Struct.new(
        :requirement,
        :requirements,
        :existing,
        :possibility_set,
        :locked_requirement,
        :requirement_trees,
        :activated_by_name,
        :underlying_error
      )

      class Conflict
        # @return [Object] a spec that was unable to be activated due to a conflict
        def possibility
          possibility_set && possibility_set.latest_version
        end
      end

      # A collection of possibility states that share the same dependencies
      # @attr [Array] dependencies the dependencies for this set of possibilities
      # @attr [Array] possibilities the possibilities
      PossibilitySet = Struct.new(:dependencies, :possibilities)

      class PossibilitySet
        # String representation of the possibility set, for debugging
        def to_s
          "[#{possibilities.join(', ')}]"
        end

        # @return [Object] most up-to-date dependency in the possibility set
        def latest_version
          possibilities.last
        end
      end

      # Details of the state to unwind to when a conflict occurs, and the cause of the unwind
      # @attr [Integer] state_index the index of the state to unwind to
      # @attr [Object] state_requirement the requirement of the state we're unwinding to
      # @attr [Array] requirement_tree for the requirement we're relaxing
      # @attr [Array] conflicting_requirements the requirements that combined to cause the conflict
      # @attr [Array] requirement_trees for the conflict
      # @attr [Array] requirements_unwound_to_instead array of unwind requirements that were chosen over this unwind
      UnwindDetails = Struct.new(
        :state_index,
        :state_requirement,
        :requirement_tree,
        :conflicting_requirements,
        :requirement_trees,
        :requirements_unwound_to_instead
      )

      class UnwindDetails
        include Comparable

        # We compare UnwindDetails when choosing which state to unwind to. If
        # two options have the same state_index we prefer the one most
        # removed from a requirement that caused the conflict. Both options
        # would unwind to the same state, but a `grandparent` option will
        # filter out fewer of its possibilities after doing so - where a state
        # is both a `parent` and a `grandparent` to requirements that have
        # caused a conflict this is the correct behaviour.
        # @param [UnwindDetail] other UnwindDetail to be compared
        # @return [Integer] integer specifying ordering
        def <=>(other)
          if state_index > other.state_index
            1
          elsif state_index == other.state_index
            reversed_requirement_tree_index <=> other.reversed_requirement_tree_index
          else
            -1
          end
        end

        # @return [Integer] index of state requirement in reversed requirement tree
        #    (the conflicting requirement itself will be at position 0)
        def reversed_requirement_tree_index
          @reversed_requirement_tree_index ||=
            if state_requirement
              requirement_tree.reverse.index(state_requirement)
            else
              999_999
            end
        end

        # @return [Boolean] where the requirement of the state we're unwinding
        #    to directly caused the conflict. Note: in this case, it is
        #    impossible for the state we're unwinding to to be a parent of
        #    any of the other conflicting requirements (or we would have
        #    circularity)
        def unwinding_to_primary_requirement?
          requirement_tree.last == state_requirement
        end

        # @return [Array] array of sub-dependencies to avoid when choosing a
        #    new possibility for the state we've unwound to. Only relevant for
        #    non-primary unwinds
        def sub_dependencies_to_avoid
          @requirements_to_avoid ||=
            requirement_trees.map do |tree|
              index = tree.index(state_requirement)
              tree[index + 1] if index
            end.compact
        end

        # @return [Array] array of all the requirements that led to the need for
        #    this unwind
        def all_requirements
          @all_requirements ||= requirement_trees.flatten(1)
        end
      end

      # @return [SpecificationProvider] the provider that knows about
      #   dependencies, requirements, specifications, versions, etc.
      attr_reader :specification_provider

      # @return [UI] the UI that knows how to communicate feedback about the
      #   resolution process back to the user
      attr_reader :resolver_ui

      # @return [DependencyGraph] the base dependency graph to which
      #   dependencies should be 'locked'
      attr_reader :base

      # @return [Array] the dependencies that were explicitly required
      attr_reader :original_requested

      # Initializes a new resolution.
      # @param [SpecificationProvider] specification_provider
      #   see {#specification_provider}
      # @param [UI] resolver_ui see {#resolver_ui}
      # @param [Array] requested see {#original_requested}
      # @param [DependencyGraph] base see {#base}
      def initialize(specification_provider, resolver_ui, requested, base)
        @specification_provider = specification_provider
        @resolver_ui = resolver_ui
        @original_requested = requested
        @base = base
        @states = []
        @iteration_counter = 0
        @parents_of = Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = [] }
      end

      # Resolves the {#original_requested} dependencies into a full dependency
      #   graph
      # @raise [ResolverError] if successful resolution is impossible
      # @return [DependencyGraph] the dependency graph of successfully resolved
      #   dependencies
      def resolve
        start_resolution

        while state
          break if !state.requirement && state.requirements.empty?
          indicate_progress
          if state.respond_to?(:pop_possibility_state) # DependencyState
            debug(depth) { "Creating possibility state for #{requirement} (#{possibilities.count} remaining)" }
            state.pop_possibility_state.tap do |s|
              if s
                states.push(s)
                activated.tag(s)
              end
            end
          end
          process_topmost_state
        end

        resolve_activated_specs
      ensure
        end_resolution
      end

      # @return [Integer] the number of resolver iterations in between calls to
      #   {#resolver_ui}'s {UI#indicate_progress} method
      attr_accessor :iteration_rate
      private :iteration_rate

      # @return [Time] the time at which resolution began
      attr_accessor :started_at
      private :started_at

      # @return [Array<ResolutionState>] the stack of states for the resolution
      attr_accessor :states
      private :states

      private

      # Sets up the resolution process
      # @return [void]
      def start_resolution
        @started_at = Time.now

        push_initial_state

        debug { "Starting resolution (#{@started_at})\nUser-requested dependencies: #{original_requested}" }
        resolver_ui.before_resolution
      end

      def resolve_activated_specs
        activated.vertices.each do |_, vertex|
          next unless vertex.payload

          latest_version = vertex.payload.possibilities.reverse_each.find do |possibility|
            vertex.requirements.all? { |req| requirement_satisfied_by?(req, activated, possibility) }
          end

          activated.set_payload(vertex.name, latest_version)
        end
        activated.freeze
      end

      # Ends the resolution process
      # @return [void]
      def end_resolution
        resolver_ui.after_resolution
        debug do
          "Finished resolution (#{@iteration_counter} steps) " \
          "(Took #{(ended_at = Time.now) - @started_at} seconds) (#{ended_at})"
        end
        debug { 'Unactivated: ' + Hash[activated.vertices.reject { |_n, v| v.payload }].keys.join(', ') } if state
        debug { 'Activated: ' + Hash[activated.vertices.select { |_n, v| v.payload }].keys.join(', ') } if state
      end

      require_relative 'state'
      require_relative 'modules/specification_provider'

      require_relative 'delegates/resolution_state'
      require_relative 'delegates/specification_provider'

      include Gem::Resolver::Molinillo::Delegates::ResolutionState
      include Gem::Resolver::Molinillo::Delegates::SpecificationProvider

      # Processes the topmost available {RequirementState} on the stack
      # @return [void]
      def process_topmost_state
        if possibility
          attempt_to_activate
        else
          create_conflict
          unwind_for_conflict
        end
      rescue CircularDependencyError => underlying_error
        create_conflict(underlying_error)
        unwind_for_conflict
      end

      # @return [Object] the current possibility that the resolution is trying
      #   to activate
      def possibility
        possibilities.last
      end

      # @return [RequirementState] the current state the resolution is
      #   operating upon
      def state
        states.last
      end

      # Creates and pushes the initial state for the resolution, based upon the
      # {#requested} dependencies
      # @return [void]
      def push_initial_state
        graph = DependencyGraph.new.tap do |dg|
          original_requested.each do |requested|
            vertex = dg.add_vertex(name_for(requested), nil, true)
            vertex.explicit_requirements << requested
          end
          dg.tag(:initial_state)
        end

        push_state_for_requirements(original_requested, true, graph)
      end

      # Unwinds the states stack because a conflict has been encountered
      # @return [void]
      def unwind_for_conflict
        details_for_unwind = build_details_for_unwind
        unwind_options = unused_unwind_options
        debug(depth) { "Unwinding for conflict: #{requirement} to #{details_for_unwind.state_index / 2}" }
        conflicts.tap do |c|
          sliced_states = states.slice!((details_for_unwind.state_index + 1)..-1)
          raise_error_unless_state(c)
          activated.rewind_to(sliced_states.first || :initial_state) if sliced_states
          state.conflicts = c
          state.unused_unwind_options = unwind_options
          filter_possibilities_after_unwind(details_for_unwind)
          index = states.size - 1
          @parents_of.each { |_, a| a.reject! { |i| i >= index } }
          state.unused_unwind_options.reject! { |uw| uw.state_index >= index }
        end
      end

      # Raises a VersionConflict error, or any underlying error, if there is no
      # current state
      # @return [void]
      def raise_error_unless_state(conflicts)
        return if state

        error = conflicts.values.map(&:underlying_error).compact.first
        raise error || VersionConflict.new(conflicts, specification_provider)
      end

      # @return [UnwindDetails] Details of the nearest index to which we could unwind
      def build_details_for_unwind
        # Get the possible unwinds for the current conflict
        current_conflict = conflicts[name]
        binding_requirements = binding_requirements_for_conflict(current_conflict)
        unwind_details = unwind_options_for_requirements(binding_requirements)

        last_detail_for_current_unwind = unwind_details.sort.last
        current_detail = last_detail_for_current_unwind

        # Look for past conflicts that could be unwound to affect the
        # requirement tree for the current conflict
        all_reqs = last_detail_for_current_unwind.all_requirements
        all_reqs_size = all_reqs.size
        relevant_unused_unwinds = unused_unwind_options.select do |alternative|
          diff_reqs = all_reqs - alternative.requirements_unwound_to_instead
          next if diff_reqs.size == all_reqs_size
          # Find the highest index unwind whilst looping through
          current_detail = alternative if alternative > current_detail
          alternative
        end

        # Add the current unwind options to the `unused_unwind_options` array.
        # The "used" option will be filtered out during `unwind_for_conflict`.
        state.unused_unwind_options += unwind_details.reject { |detail| detail.state_index == -1 }

        # Update the requirements_unwound_to_instead on any relevant unused unwinds
        relevant_unused_unwinds.each do |d|
          (d.requirements_unwound_to_instead << current_detail.state_requirement).uniq!
        end
        unwind_details.each do |d|
          (d.requirements_unwound_to_instead << current_detail.state_requirement).uniq!
        end

        current_detail
      end

      # @param [Array<Object>] binding_requirements array of requirements that combine to create a conflict
      # @return [Array<UnwindDetails>] array of UnwindDetails that have a chance
      #    of resolving the passed requirements
      def unwind_options_for_requirements(binding_requirements)
        unwind_details = []

        trees = []
        binding_requirements.reverse_each do |r|
          partial_tree = [r]
          trees << partial_tree
          unwind_details << UnwindDetails.new(-1, nil, partial_tree, binding_requirements, trees, [])

          # If this requirement has alternative possibilities, check if any would
          # satisfy the other requirements that created this conflict
          requirement_state = find_state_for(r)
          if conflict_fixing_possibilities?(requirement_state, binding_requirements)
            unwind_details << UnwindDetails.new(
              states.index(requirement_state),
              r,
              partial_tree,
              binding_requirements,
              trees,
              []
            )
          end

          # Next, look at the parent of this requirement, and check if the requirement
          # could have been avoided if an alternative PossibilitySet had been chosen
          parent_r = parent_of(r)
          next if parent_r.nil?
          partial_tree.unshift(parent_r)
          requirement_state = find_state_for(parent_r)
          if requirement_state.possibilities.any? { |set| !set.dependencies.include?(r) }
            unwind_details << UnwindDetails.new(
              states.index(requirement_state),
              parent_r,
              partial_tree,
              binding_requirements,
              trees,
              []
            )
          end

          # Finally, look at the grandparent and up of this requirement, looking
          # for any possibilities that wouldn't create their parent requirement
          grandparent_r = parent_of(parent_r)
          until grandparent_r.nil?
            partial_tree.unshift(grandparent_r)
            requirement_state = find_state_for(grandparent_r)
            if requirement_state.possibilities.any? { |set| !set.dependencies.include?(parent_r) }
              unwind_details << UnwindDetails.new(
                states.index(requirement_state),
                grandparent_r,
                partial_tree,
                binding_requirements,
                trees,
                []
              )
            end
            parent_r = grandparent_r
            grandparent_r = parent_of(parent_r)
          end
        end

        unwind_details
      end

      # @param [DependencyState] state
      # @param [Array] binding_requirements array of requirements
      # @return [Boolean] whether or not the given state has any possibilities
      #    that could satisfy the given requirements
      def conflict_fixing_possibilities?(state, binding_requirements)
        return false unless state

        state.possibilities.any? do |possibility_set|
          possibility_set.possibilities.any? do |poss|
            possibility_satisfies_requirements?(poss, binding_requirements)
          end
        end
      end

      # Filter's a state's possibilities to remove any that would not fix the
      # conflict we've just rewound from
      # @param [UnwindDetails] unwind_details details of the conflict just
      #   unwound from
      # @return [void]
      def filter_possibilities_after_unwind(unwind_details)
        return unless state && !state.possibilities.empty?

        if unwind_details.unwinding_to_primary_requirement?
          filter_possibilities_for_primary_unwind(unwind_details)
        else
          filter_possibilities_for_parent_unwind(unwind_details)
        end
      end

      # Filter's a state's possibilities to remove any that would not satisfy
      # the requirements in the conflict we've just rewound from
      # @param [UnwindDetails] unwind_details details of the conflict just unwound from
      # @return [void]
      def filter_possibilities_for_primary_unwind(unwind_details)
        unwinds_to_state = unused_unwind_options.select { |uw| uw.state_index == unwind_details.state_index }
        unwinds_to_state << unwind_details
        unwind_requirement_sets = unwinds_to_state.map(&:conflicting_requirements)

        state.possibilities.reject! do |possibility_set|
          possibility_set.possibilities.none? do |poss|
            unwind_requirement_sets.any? do |requirements|
              possibility_satisfies_requirements?(poss, requirements)
            end
          end
        end
      end

      # @param [Object] possibility a single possibility
      # @param [Array] requirements an array of requirements
      # @return [Boolean] whether the possibility satisfies all of the
      #    given requirements
      def possibility_satisfies_requirements?(possibility, requirements)
        name = name_for(possibility)

        activated.tag(:swap)
        activated.set_payload(name, possibility) if activated.vertex_named(name)
        satisfied = requirements.all? { |r| requirement_satisfied_by?(r, activated, possibility) }
        activated.rewind_to(:swap)

        satisfied
      end

      # Filter's a state's possibilities to remove any that would (eventually)
      # create a requirement in the conflict we've just rewound from
      # @param [UnwindDetails] unwind_details details of the conflict just unwound from
      # @return [void]
      def filter_possibilities_for_parent_unwind(unwind_details)
        unwinds_to_state = unused_unwind_options.select { |uw| uw.state_index == unwind_details.state_index }
        unwinds_to_state << unwind_details

        primary_unwinds = unwinds_to_state.select(&:unwinding_to_primary_requirement?).uniq
        parent_unwinds = unwinds_to_state.uniq - primary_unwinds

        allowed_possibility_sets = primary_unwinds.flat_map do |unwind|
          states[unwind.state_index].possibilities.select do |possibility_set|
            possibility_set.possibilities.any? do |poss|
              possibility_satisfies_requirements?(poss, unwind.conflicting_requirements)
            end
          end
        end

        requirements_to_avoid = parent_unwinds.flat_map(&:sub_dependencies_to_avoid)

        state.possibilities.reject! do |possibility_set|
          !allowed_possibility_sets.include?(possibility_set) &&
            (requirements_to_avoid - possibility_set.dependencies).empty?
        end
      end

      # @param [Conflict] conflict
      # @return [Array] minimal array of requirements that would cause the passed
      #    conflict to occur.
      def binding_requirements_for_conflict(conflict)
        return [conflict.requirement] if conflict.possibility.nil?

        possible_binding_requirements = conflict.requirements.values.flatten(1).uniq

        # When there's a `CircularDependency` error the conflicting requirement
        # (the one causing the circular) won't be `conflict.requirement`
        # (which won't be for the right state, because we won't have created it,
        # because it's circular).
        # We need to make sure we have that requirement in the conflict's list,
        # otherwise we won't be able to unwind properly, so we just return all
        # the requirements for the conflict.
        return possible_binding_requirements if conflict.underlying_error

        possibilities = search_for(conflict.requirement)

        # If all the requirements together don't filter out all possibilities,
        # then the only two requirements we need to consider are the initial one
        # (where the dependency's version was first chosen) and the last
        if binding_requirement_in_set?(nil, possible_binding_requirements, possibilities)
          return [conflict.requirement, requirement_for_existing_name(name_for(conflict.requirement))].compact
        end

        # Loop through the possible binding requirements, removing each one
        # that doesn't bind. Use a `reverse_each` as we want the earliest set of
        # binding requirements, and don't use `reject!` as we wish to refine the
        # array *on each iteration*.
        binding_requirements = possible_binding_requirements.dup
        possible_binding_requirements.reverse_each do |req|
          next if req == conflict.requirement
          unless binding_requirement_in_set?(req, binding_requirements, possibilities)
            binding_requirements -= [req]
          end
        end

        binding_requirements
      end

      # @param [Object] requirement we wish to check
      # @param [Array] possible_binding_requirements array of requirements
      # @param [Array] possibilities array of possibilities the requirements will be used to filter
      # @return [Boolean] whether or not the given requirement is required to filter
      #    out all elements of the array of possibilities.
      def binding_requirement_in_set?(requirement, possible_binding_requirements, possibilities)
        possibilities.any? do |poss|
          possibility_satisfies_requirements?(poss, possible_binding_requirements - [requirement])
        end
      end

      # @param [Object] requirement
      # @return [Object] the requirement that led to `requirement` being added
      #   to the list of requirements.
      def parent_of(requirement)
        return unless requirement
        return unless index = @parents_of[requirement].last
        return unless parent_state = @states[index]
        parent_state.requirement
      end

      # @param [String] name
      # @return [Object] the requirement that led to a version of a possibility
      #   with the given name being activated.
      def requirement_for_existing_name(name)
        return nil unless vertex = activated.vertex_named(name)
        return nil unless vertex.payload
        states.find { |s| s.name == name }.requirement
      end

      # @param [Object] requirement
      # @return [ResolutionState] the state whose `requirement` is the given
      #   `requirement`.
      def find_state_for(requirement)
        return nil unless requirement
        states.find { |i| requirement == i.requirement }
      end

      # @param [Object] underlying_error
      # @return [Conflict] a {Conflict} that reflects the failure to activate
      #   the {#possibility} in conjunction with the current {#state}
      def create_conflict(underlying_error = nil)
        vertex = activated.vertex_named(name)
        locked_requirement = locked_requirement_named(name)

        requirements = {}
        unless vertex.explicit_requirements.empty?
          requirements[name_for_explicit_dependency_source] = vertex.explicit_requirements
        end
        requirements[name_for_locking_dependency_source] = [locked_requirement] if locked_requirement
        vertex.incoming_edges.each do |edge|
          (requirements[edge.origin.payload.latest_version] ||= []).unshift(edge.requirement)
        end

        activated_by_name = {}
        activated.each { |v| activated_by_name[v.name] = v.payload.latest_version if v.payload }
        conflicts[name] = Conflict.new(
          requirement,
          requirements,
          vertex.payload && vertex.payload.latest_version,
          possibility,
          locked_requirement,
          requirement_trees,
          activated_by_name,
          underlying_error
        )
      end

      # @return [Array<Array<Object>>] The different requirement
      #   trees that led to every requirement for the current spec.
      def requirement_trees
        vertex = activated.vertex_named(name)
        vertex.requirements.map { |r| requirement_tree_for(r) }
      end

      # @param [Object] requirement
      # @return [Array<Object>] the list of requirements that led to
      #   `requirement` being required.
      def requirement_tree_for(requirement)
        tree = []
        while requirement
          tree.unshift(requirement)
          requirement = parent_of(requirement)
        end
        tree
      end

      # Indicates progress roughly once every second
      # @return [void]
      def indicate_progress
        @iteration_counter += 1
        @progress_rate ||= resolver_ui.progress_rate
        if iteration_rate.nil?
          if Time.now - started_at >= @progress_rate
            self.iteration_rate = @iteration_counter
          end
        end

        if iteration_rate && (@iteration_counter % iteration_rate) == 0
          resolver_ui.indicate_progress
        end
      end

      # Calls the {#resolver_ui}'s {UI#debug} method
      # @param [Integer] depth the depth of the {#states} stack
      # @param [Proc] block a block that yields a {#to_s}
      # @return [void]
      def debug(depth = 0, &block)
        resolver_ui.debug(depth, &block)
      end

      # Attempts to activate the current {#possibility}
      # @return [void]
      def attempt_to_activate
        debug(depth) { 'Attempting to activate ' + possibility.to_s }
        existing_vertex = activated.vertex_named(name)
        if existing_vertex.payload
          debug(depth) { "Found existing spec (#{existing_vertex.payload})" }
          attempt_to_filter_existing_spec(existing_vertex)
        else
          latest = possibility.latest_version
          possibility.possibilities.select! do |possibility|
            requirement_satisfied_by?(requirement, activated, possibility)
          end
          if possibility.latest_version.nil?
            # ensure there's a possibility for better error messages
            possibility.possibilities << latest if latest
            create_conflict
            unwind_for_conflict
          else
            activate_new_spec
          end
        end
      end

      # Attempts to update the existing vertex's `PossibilitySet` with a filtered version
      # @return [void]
      def attempt_to_filter_existing_spec(vertex)
        filtered_set = filtered_possibility_set(vertex)
        if !filtered_set.possibilities.empty?
          activated.set_payload(name, filtered_set)
          new_requirements = requirements.dup
          push_state_for_requirements(new_requirements, false)
        else
          create_conflict
          debug(depth) { "Unsatisfied by existing spec (#{vertex.payload})" }
          unwind_for_conflict
        end
      end

      # Generates a filtered version of the existing vertex's `PossibilitySet` using the
      # current state's `requirement`
      # @param [Object] vertex existing vertex
      # @return [PossibilitySet] filtered possibility set
      def filtered_possibility_set(vertex)
        PossibilitySet.new(vertex.payload.dependencies, vertex.payload.possibilities & possibility.possibilities)
      end

      # @param [String] requirement_name the spec name to search for
      # @return [Object] the locked spec named `requirement_name`, if one
      #   is found on {#base}
      def locked_requirement_named(requirement_name)
        vertex = base.vertex_named(requirement_name)
        vertex && vertex.payload
      end

      # Add the current {#possibility} to the dependency graph of the current
      # {#state}
      # @return [void]
      def activate_new_spec
        conflicts.delete(name)
        debug(depth) { "Activated #{name} at #{possibility}" }
        activated.set_payload(name, possibility)
        require_nested_dependencies_for(possibility)
      end

      # Requires the dependencies that the recently activated spec has
      # @param [Object] possibility_set the PossibilitySet that has just been
      #   activated
      # @return [void]
      def require_nested_dependencies_for(possibility_set)
        nested_dependencies = dependencies_for(possibility_set.latest_version)
        debug(depth) { "Requiring nested dependencies (#{nested_dependencies.join(', ')})" }
        nested_dependencies.each do |d|
          activated.add_child_vertex(name_for(d), nil, [name_for(possibility_set.latest_version)], d)
          parent_index = states.size - 1
          parents = @parents_of[d]
          parents << parent_index if parents.empty?
        end

        push_state_for_requirements(requirements + nested_dependencies, !nested_dependencies.empty?)
      end

      # Pushes a new {DependencyState} that encapsulates both existing and new
      # requirements
      # @param [Array] new_requirements
      # @param [Boolean] requires_sort
      # @param [Object] new_activated
      # @return [void]
      def push_state_for_requirements(new_requirements, requires_sort = true, new_activated = activated)
        new_requirements = sort_dependencies(new_requirements.uniq, new_activated, conflicts) if requires_sort
        new_requirement = nil
        loop do
          new_requirement = new_requirements.shift
          break if new_requirement.nil? || states.none? { |s| s.requirement == new_requirement }
        end
        new_name = new_requirement ? name_for(new_requirement) : ''.freeze
        possibilities = possibilities_for_requirement(new_requirement)
        handle_missing_or_push_dependency_state DependencyState.new(
          new_name, new_requirements, new_activated,
          new_requirement, possibilities, depth, conflicts.dup, unused_unwind_options.dup
        )
      end

      # Checks a proposed requirement with any existing locked requirement
      # before generating an array of possibilities for it.
      # @param [Object] requirement the proposed requirement
      # @param [Object] activated
      # @return [Array] possibilities
      def possibilities_for_requirement(requirement, activated = self.activated)
        return [] unless requirement
        if locked_requirement_named(name_for(requirement))
          return locked_requirement_possibility_set(requirement, activated)
        end

        group_possibilities(search_for(requirement))
      end

      # @param [Object] requirement the proposed requirement
      # @param [Object] activated
      # @return [Array] possibility set containing only the locked requirement, if any
      def locked_requirement_possibility_set(requirement, activated = self.activated)
        all_possibilities = search_for(requirement)
        locked_requirement = locked_requirement_named(name_for(requirement))

        # Longwinded way to build a possibilities array with either the locked
        # requirement or nothing in it. Required, since the API for
        # locked_requirement isn't guaranteed.
        locked_possibilities = all_possibilities.select do |possibility|
          requirement_satisfied_by?(locked_requirement, activated, possibility)
        end

        group_possibilities(locked_possibilities)
      end

      # Build an array of PossibilitySets, with each element representing a group of
      # dependency versions that all have the same sub-dependency version constraints
      # and are contiguous.
      # @param [Array] possibilities an array of possibilities
      # @return [Array<PossibilitySet>] an array of possibility sets
      def group_possibilities(possibilities)
        possibility_sets = []
        current_possibility_set = nil

        possibilities.reverse_each do |possibility|
          dependencies = dependencies_for(possibility)
          if current_possibility_set && dependencies_equal?(current_possibility_set.dependencies, dependencies)
            current_possibility_set.possibilities.unshift(possibility)
          else
            possibility_sets.unshift(PossibilitySet.new(dependencies, [possibility]))
            current_possibility_set = possibility_sets.first
          end
        end

        possibility_sets
      end

      # Pushes a new {DependencyState}.
      # If the {#specification_provider} says to
      # {SpecificationProvider#allow_missing?} that particular requirement, and
      # there are no possibilities for that requirement, then `state` is not
      # pushed, and the vertex in {#activated} is removed, and we continue
      # resolving the remaining requirements.
      # @param [DependencyState] state
      # @return [void]
      def handle_missing_or_push_dependency_state(state)
        if state.requirement && state.possibilities.empty? && allow_missing?(state.requirement)
          state.activated.detach_vertex_named(state.name)
          push_state_for_requirements(state.requirements.dup, false, state.activated)
        else
          states.push(state).tap { activated.tag(state) }
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

Youez - 2016 - github.com/yon3zu
LinuXploit